Unified security evidence: connect approved vulnerability, cloud, Kubernetes, identity, CI/CD and incident sources without replacing existing operational tools.
Your team has findings. You need to know which combinations can interrupt the business.
Your scanners, cloud platforms and identity systems describe different parts of the same risk.
Reduce the risk that matters to your business within 90 days
You have security tools, teams and remediation backlogs. The difficult part is deciding which combination of issues threatens a critical service, what must change first, and how to demonstrate that the change worked. Our Risk Compression Sprint brings those decisions into one time-bound engagement. Deep InfoSec works with your security, cloud, identity and business-service owners; Deep Advisor supplies the attack-path analysis and scenario evidence.
Security testing is part of how we build and maintain our products
Deep InfoSec performs daily automated security scanning, annual penetration tests of its solutions, recurring security assessments combining human analysis with AI, and ongoing adversarial exercises intended to break assumptions before attackers exploit them. We use the findings to correct code, configuration, authentication, dependencies and operational controls, then verify the fixes in the affected environment.
Deep Advisor explores attack-path hypotheses beyond known single-vulnerability patterns. It evaluates combinations of reachability, privileges and exposed services, proposes mitigations linked to each path, and helps analysts reduce the set of viable paths open to an attacker. These insights inform technical remediation and its verification.
Review the assessment methods ↗See the work behind the offer
Follow a realistic engineering situation, from the first signal to the decision and the evidence handed over.
What this means for your organisation
Your scanners, cloud platforms and identity systems describe different parts of the same risk. Deep Advisor connects authorized evidence to show potential attack paths toward a service you care about. Instead of treating every finding as an isolated ticket, your analysts can examine the relationships, challenge the assumptions and compare the effect of different controls.
We start with a business service and source data you approve. You receive an explainable path assessment, a proposed remediation order, ownership of each action and tests that can demonstrate whether the path is actually closed. Your existing security tools stay part of the process.
A practical starting point
Choose a starting scope, review the evidence and prepare a usable purchasing brief. Public service information is open to everyone; confidential architecture and qualification materials follow the secure dossier process.
Prepare a project brief ↗Selected readings ↗How this works in practice
Choose a representative situation and follow the signal, the operational decision and the evidence produced.
Identity to critical application
A privileged identity can reach a service through a cloud configuration gap and an exposed management endpoint.
Compare the value of limiting identity privileges, closing the exposed endpoint and tightening network access.
Attack-path diagram, source evidence, intervention owner and verification test.
Example workflow
A useful technical evaluation
We select an authorized environment and agree what a successful decision will require before collecting data. The plan identifies prerequisites, integration contacts, data boundaries, operator permissions and rollback responsibilities. We test an agreed set of realistic scenarios and record both relevant results and any coverage gaps. The handover contains configuration and architecture notes, examples of decisions, explicit go/no-go criteria and the next implementation steps.
Discuss an evaluation scope ↗Attack-path intelligence and decision support
A large vulnerability count does not tell an executive which sequence of failures could interrupt payments, production or care.
CISOs, risk teams, auditors and boards facing fragmented technical evidence.
Specialist workstreams
Security decision intelligence connecting attack paths, business impact, ownership and verifiable remediation.
Attack-path reasoning: relate exposures, exploitable sequences, compensating controls and critical business services; distinguish observed evidence from modeled assumptions.
Decision intelligence: turn technical findings into accountable decision cards with owner, rationale, urgency, alternative mitigations and verification criteria.
Executive and audit reporting: generate traceable remediation history, control mappings, prioritized backlogs and board-ready views of risk, business impact and recoverability.
What your team receives
- Source integration and coverage matrix
- Business-service and attack-path map with evidence links
- Prioritized decision cards, accountable owners and action plan
- Executive scorecard, change chronology and auditable remediation dossier
Defined entry offers
Acceptance is tied to the agreed deliverables and documented review.
Technical assessment
Unified security evidence: connect approved vulnerability, cloud, Kubernetes, identity, CI/CD and incident sources without replacing existing operational tools.
Source integration and coverage matrixRequest a technical and commercial proposal ↗Design and controlled evaluation
Attack-path reasoning: relate exposures, exploitable sequences, compensating controls and critical business services; distinguish observed evidence from modeled assumptions.
Business-service and attack-path map with evidence linksRequest a technical and commercial proposal ↗Delivery, review & continuity
Executive and audit reporting: generate traceable remediation history, control mappings, prioritized backlogs and board-ready views of risk, business impact and recoverability.
Executive scorecard, change chronology and auditable remediation dossierRequest a technical and commercial proposal ↗How a project progresses
Software platform plus specialist risk engineering; connectors, hosting, data residency and automation permissions are scoped per engagement. AI can assist prioritization without replacing human authorization.
- 01
Discover and define: assets, objectives, dependencies, data access, stakeholders and boundaries.
- 02
Design and validate: target architecture, methods, constraints, workplan and objective acceptance criteria.
- 03
Deliver and transfer: approved implementation, findings, tests, documentation, training and next-stage options.
Request a technical and commercial proposal
Choose one critical service and a bounded set of existing security data sources for a proof-of-value decision review.
Engineering and services that work together
Where this matters
Deep Advisor turns dispersed scanner, identity, cloud and endpoint findings into a connected view of exploitable attack paths. Instead of treating every alert as an equally urgent problem, teams can see which combinations reach critical systems, which controls interrupt those paths, and which intervention changes risk most meaningfully. Reports link findings to owners, decisions and supporting evidence for engineers and executives.
Solutions for your role
Begin with your decisions, risks and procurement obligations—not a generic product catalogue.
Explore the technical evaluation
Attack-path risk management and professional assurance
Our security assessment, penetration-testing, CISO and disaster-recovery work uses defined technical criteria and repeatable evidence. OSPCRM connects weaknesses, identities, access paths and critical services to model plausible attack sequences and compare the controls that reduce exposure. Its predictive method helps teams examine how risk may change as architectures, privileges or threats change.
OSPCRM
OSPCRM certification eligibility begins with demonstrable, effectively implemented ISO-level management practices. PASC then conducts its own assessment of the applicant’s methods, controls and evidence.
PASC / ONPC-RDC
Deep InfoSec supports risk management, CISO advisory, disaster recovery, audits and penetration testing under the agreed PASC/OSPCRM scope. For an external independent assessment, the assessment is entrusted to a separate PASC-conformant entity; the DRC institutional route involves ONPC-RDC. The performing and reviewing organizations are identified in the engagement.